The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights whilst respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing within the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
In accordance with the EPA fee schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and never be supposed for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are in the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are distinct within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy subject matter on the approval in the competent authority.
It is currently very well-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different, therefore, in our view the acquired Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded as within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]
In any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. On the list of most major crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is critical to make certain justice prevails.
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up along with the employee is found guilty after due process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not really sufficient even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful manner. Read more
Knowledge in the accused is a matter to become inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard to get proved otherwise.”
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration by the Court under Article 184 (3), has been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access towards more info the public to method the superior courts as well as the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
This article delves into the intricacies in the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case legislation, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and simple applications.
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence and also the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed with the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]